![]() ![]() The only just cause is self-defense, understood as the response to an armed attack that is actual or imminent in the sense that it has already begun. Revenge, justice, or religious conversion are no longer proper objectives. Jus ad bellum questions concern legitimate authority, which usually means that only sovereign states can make war, with the aim being the return to peace. Just wars are circumscribed in their causes, aims, duration, and conduct they should not go on ad infinitum, with no clear end in sight. If war cannot be avoided, then it must be limited by concerns of justice. The following is an edited transcript of the presentations.Īlthough there are many approaches to the ethics of war, the laws of war are rooted in the Western tradition that regards war as something that ought to be avoided and quite distinct from peace. Mandel Annual Public Lecture and 2052nd Stated Meeting, was live streamed to groups of Academy members and other participants gathered at George Washington University, Stanford University, and the University of Notre Dame. ![]() The program, which served as the 2017 Distinguished Morton L. Hauser Professor of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law at Harvard Law School) participated in a discussion of the war on terror and whether conflicts with non-state actors can be fought in a just way. ![]() Chan School of Public Health and Director of the FXB Center for Health and Human Rights at Harvard University), and Gabriella Blum (Rita E. Crawford (Professor of Political Science at Boston University), Jennifer Leaning (François-Xavier Bagnoud Professor of the Practice of Health and Human Rights at the Harvard T.H. Weiner (Senior Lecturer in Law and Director of the Program in International and Comparative Law at Stanford Law School), Neta C. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |